search for


Effects of Squat Exercise according to Weight Support on Balance and Gait in Patients after Total Hip Replacement: a Pilot Study
J Kor Phys Ther 2022;34(3):104-109
Published online June 30, 2022;
© 2022 The Korea Society of Physical Therapy.

So Yeong Kim, Woon Su Cho, Byeong Geun Kim

Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
Byeong Geun Kim E-mail
Received May 24, 2022; Revised June 20, 2022; Accepted June 22, 2022.
This is an Open Access article distribute under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study is to identify the problems and stability of a study to investigate “Effects of Squat Exercise according to Weight Support on Balance and Gait in Patients after Total Hip Replacement.” before proceeding with the study.
Methods: Twenty-two rehabilitation patients after THR surgery who met the selection criteria participated. The study subjects were randomly assigned to a squat group using a slider or a squat group using a reformer. The interventions were applied for two weeks. The patients were assessed using Berg balance scale (BBS), Timed up and go test (TUG), and 10-meter walking test (10MW).
Results: Although twenty-two study subjects participated in this study, eight study subjects participated dropouts occurred during the study period. There was a significant difference within the group in BBS and TUG in two groups (p<0.05). The difference between the two groups was not significant in all outcome measures (p>0.05). The largest effect size was 1.21 and the smallest effect size was 0.39, all from the BBS.
Conclusion: This pilot study suggest that it is feasible with minor adjustment to conduct a larger scale, powered RCT to examine the efficacy of squat exercise according to weight support with patients after THR.
Keywords : Total hip replacement, Rehabilitation, Squat, Pilot study

The incidence of hip fractures continues to increase.1,2 This is because fractures occur frequently in the elderly. After age 50, 1/2 of women and 1/5 of men and half of osteoporotic patients experience a fracture.3-5 Since fractures are associated with mortality in the elderly, appropriate treatment and management are required.6,7

After hip fracture, surgery is the most common.6 After surgery rehabilitation is important because it affects recovery depending on the timing of it.8 Early rehabilitation after surgery shortens the length of hospital stay and reduces pain.9 In addition, delayed after-surgery rehabilitation is associated with the onset of delirium and pneumonia and increases in the length of hospital stay.10 Therefore, after surgery rehabilitation is necessary.

After surgery rehabilitation exercises include many exercises such as early walking,11 progressive muscle strengthening exercise,12 weight-bearing exercise,13 and balance exercise.14 Among them, After surgery weight-bearing exercise is presented as an important exercise. Physical therapists also prefer weight-bearing exercises to progressive resistance exercises.15 Therefore, It is important to exercise after surgery weight-bearing.

However, previous studies on weight-bearing exercise and squats have limitations. Previous weight-bearing studies have shown that early rehabilitation using crutches after surgery involves a risk of falls,16 and weight-bearing exercises were carried out several months after surgery.17 Therefore, previous studies have a risk of falls and missed the early rehabilitation period.

There are also limitations on squats. Patients can squat up to 80 degrees of hip joint after surgery.18 However, there is a limitation that patients do not squat due to anxiety about dislocation, despite their ability to squat increases after surgery.19

Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to identify the problems and stability of a main study to examine “the effects of squat exercise according to weight support on balance and gait in patients after total hip replacement (THR).” before proceeding with the main study.


This pilot study was prepared in compliance with the reporting recommendations of the CONSORT statement.20,21 This study was conducted with the approval of G Hospital. Consent was obtained from all participants before the study.

1. Subject

This study was conducted from October to December 2021 with twenty-two patients who were hospitalized and being treated at G Rehabilitation Hospital in Gwangju to which they were transferred after THR surgery. Study subjects were recruited through a notice for recruitment of study participants on a bulletin board in the hospital. The selection criteria were 1) those who received their medical attendant’s finding that they could support their weight, 2) those who could walk at least 10m using a walking aid or independently, and 3) those who voluntarily agreed to the study. Exclusion criteria were 1) those who had pathological problems at the surgical site, 2) those who were diagnosed with a neurological problem, and 3) those who had visual or hearing impairments. The number of subjects in this pilot study was calculated to be 22 in total by adding 10% to the minimum sample size of a pilot study, which is 10 per group.22,23 Twenty-two participants in this study were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The ratio of allocation was 1:1. An assessor prepared randomly shuffled sticks (A stick: Reformer; and B stick: Sliding) and sealed each stick in an opaque envelope. The participants were assigned to the groups for the sticks they selected.

2. Experimental method

The subjects of this study were commonly intervened with general physical therapy and occupational therapy. Thereafter, they were intervened with the intervention methods assigned to each group. The intensity and frequency of interventions were applied according to the individual condition of the patient. Interventions were conducted daily for 2 weeks.

1) Reformer

The reformer used in this study (REFORMER, KOREA) enables gradual muscle strengthening exercise as the strength can be adjusted in the supine position through the degree of compression of the spring connected to the device. The exercise program is as follows (Table 1, Figure 1A).

Exercise program

Exercise program Detailed items Duration
Warm-up Mobility exercise for the hip joint 5 min
Main exercise ① After fixing both feet on a flat ground, bend and straighten the knees 20 min
② Support training by lifting the legs alternately
③ Place both soles of the feet on the ground and lift the heels
④ Put one foot on the ground and lift the heel
Cooling down Mobility exercise for the hip joint 5 min

Fig. 1. Exercise by group. (A) Reformer group, (B) Sliding group.

2) Slide

The sliding trainer used in this study (Man&Tel, KOREA) can make a standing inclination angles from 0 to 60 degrees and enables weight bearing training through various exercises using ground reaction forces. The exercise program is as follows (Table 1, Figure 1B).

3. Measurement

1) Side effect

The subjects of this study were asked whether any side effect occurred at each treatment session, and the results were recorded in a standardized form.

2) Primary outcome

The Berg balance scale (BBS) was used to assess balance ability. The scale consisted of 14 activities of the subjects related to balance ranging from sitting to standing including standing on one leg. The subjects are scored from 0 to 4 points according to the level of performance of each item so that the full score is a total of 56 points and higher scores indicate better balance ability.

The timed up and go test (TUG) was used to assess balance ability. The subject is prepared by sitting in an upright posture on a chair with a backrest. The time taken for the subject to safely return to the chair after going to the turning point at a distance of 3m following a starting signal and turning around the turning point using a walking aid or by walking independently depending on the functional state of the subject. When turning around the turning point, the subjects were instructed to turn around the unaffected side so that no rotational force would be applied to the fracture site.

3) Secondary outcome

The 10-meter walking test (10MW) was used to determine walking ability. The subjects can walk independently or use assistive tools and are instructed to walk in their usual gait. In order to exclude acceleration and deceleration, the subject should walk from 2m before the first mark to 2m after the last mark, which are the boundaries of 10m. The test begins when the subject passes over the first mark line and ends when the subject passes over the last mark line.

4. Statistical analysis

The purpose of this pilot study is not to test a hypothesis, but to confirm the validity of the main study.24,25 In this study, descriptive statistics were performed using a statistical program (SPSS for Windows, version 21.0, IBM, Chicago, IL) for recruitment data, baseline characteristics, and outcome measures. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to see the difference between groups and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to see the difference within the group. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s D method for each group.


1. Study subjects

Twenty two study subjects participated in this pilot study. Among them, 14 completed the 2-week study participation. A total of eight subjects did not complete the study participation in this pilot study. Out of the eight subjects in total, two were transferred to other hospitals, four were abruptly discharged, and two were unable to complete the participation in the study due to COVID-19. Two patients who were transferred to other hospitals suffered injuries due to carelessness in the ward that was not related to the study intervention. The reasons for the transfers were fractures in the knee joint and injuries at the surgical site. The flow of study subjects' participation in the study is as shown in Figure 2. No side effects were observed in 14 subjects who completed the participation in this study. Table 2 shows the general characteristics of those study subjects who completed their participation in the study.

Characteristics of subjects

Characteristic Reformer Sliding All patients
Patients (n) 7 7 14
Male patients (n) 2 1 3
Female patients (n) 5 6 11
Age (yr) 72.7±16.7 75.4±7.5 74.1±12.5
Height (cm) 159.6±9.9 155.3±6.9 157.4±8.5
Weight (kg) 55.5±8.7 56.4±11.5 56.0±9.8
Surgery side (L) 4 3 7
Surgery side (R) 2 4 6
Surgery side (B) 1 0 1

Mean±SD, L: Left, R: Right, B: Both.

Fig. 2. CONSORT flow diagram of the experimental design.

2. Outcome measures

The results of assessment of the 14 subjects who completed their participation in this study are shown in Table 3. The difference between the two groups was not significant in all outcome measures (p>0.05). There was a significant difference within the group in BBS and TUG in two groups (p<0.05). The effect sizes in the results of assessment varied from a small effect size to a large effect size. The largest effect size was 1.21 and the smallest effect size was 0.39, all from the BBS.

Comparison of reformer and sliding

Variable Intervention Pre Post Change Effect size
BBS (score) Reformer 24.71±14.31 40.29±11.32* 15.57±15.13 1.21
Sliding 34.86±13.75 40.29±13.74* 5.43±3.51 0.39
TUG (sec) Reformer 35.97±29.87 26.12±17.59* -9.84±14.03 0.4
Sliding 36.66±22.36 21.13±11.40* -15.53±14.86 0.88
10MW (sec) Reformer 36.53±29.58 21.74±7.07 -14.79±24.97 0.69
Sliding 29.06±20.10 20.75±16.76 -8.32±17.78 0.45

Mean±SD, BBS: Berg balance scale, TUG: The timed up and go test, 10MW: 10-meter walking test.

*Significant differences within groups.


Although the weight-bearing intervention method after THR surgery is a preferred intervention method in rehabilitation, there are limitations in the diversity and stability of the weight-bearing method based on previous studies to date. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to confirm the feasibility of the weight-bearing method through the squat in the rehabilitation of patients after THR surgery. As a result of this study, there was a significant difference in BBS and TUG within group in both groups. However, 10MW was no significant difference within the group in both groups. And there was no difference between the two groups in all variables.

A squat that repeatedly flexion and extension the ankle, knee, and hip joints were performed as an intervention method In this study. Squat and sit-to-stand are basic movements frequently performed daily,26,27 but studies on the squat applied to patients lack the evidence. In a previous study on THR surgery patients, the effect of the squat could not be confirmed because the squat was included in the complex exercise program.28 This study differs from this previous study in that balance was not evaluated in the previous study in which strength training was performed in a form similar to that of the squat.29 In this study, it is thought that the balance was improved because repeated contractions affected proprioception. Therefore, additional studies involving a lot of subjects are needed to determine the effect of squat on balance in THR patients.

Weight support is an important factor for patients after THR. The weight-bearing group can be discharged from the hospital earlier than the weight-bearing restriction group,30 and it is effective in improving functional performance.31 However, when patients are instructed to bear their self-own weight, they do not perform adequate weight-bearing.32 Therefore, weight-bearing exercise under the supervision of a physical therapist is necessary for a quick return to daily life after surgery.

Some limitations need to be supplemented in future studies. First, pilot studies like this provide opportunities to review all aspects of the main studies thereby helping researchers, study participants, and study resources not to be wasted.21 As a result of this study, the balance was restored, so the intervention method is valid. However, there is no control group in this study design, so it is difficult to confirm the effect. Therefore, it is necessary to proceed with the RCT study with the addition of a control group during the main study. Second, THR patients are more common in winter.33 However, there is a limitation in planning the study period as one season and one year. There is a possibility that the sample size required for the main study may not be fully recruited during the previously planned study period. Therefore, it is necessary to consider modifying the study period to a multi-year study period or a multi-center study. Third, Eight subjects were dropped out In this pilot study. In the main study, attention should be paid to simple changes of mind and COVID-19 infection for the study subject's participation. Currently, the world is at risk of infectious diseases due to the COVID-19 pandemic.34 Methods to lower the risk of contracting COVID-19 in study subjects during the study period should be considered. Therefore, when calculating the size of the main study sample, a method of calculating the dropout rate from 10% to 20% should be considered.

In conclusion, this pilot study suggest that it is feasible with minor adjustment to conduct a larger scale, powered RCT to examine the efficacy of squat exercise according to weight support with patients after THR.

  1. Hagino H, Furukawa K, Fujiwara S et al. Recent trends in the incidence and lifetime risk of hip fracture in Tottori, Japan. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(4):543-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Chie WC, Yang RS, Liu JP et al. High incidence rate of hip fracture in Taiwan: estimated from a nationwide health insurance database. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(12):998-1002.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Van der Velde RY, Wyers CE, Curtis EM et al. Secular trends in fracture incidence in the UK between 1990 and 2012. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(11):3197-206.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR et al. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(6):781-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Hsiao PC, Chen TJ, Li CY et al. Risk factors and incidence of repeat osteoporotic fractures among the elderly in Taiwan: a population-based cohort study. Medicine. 2015;94(7):e532.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. LeBlanc KE, Muncie Jr HL, LeBlanc LL. Hip fracture: diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2014;89(12):945-51.
  7. Yoo JI, Kim HH, Ha YC et al. Osteosarcopenia in patients with hip fracture is related with high mortality. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(4):e27.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Min KH, Beom JW, Kim BR et al. Clinical practice guideline for postoperative rehabilitation in older patients with hip fractures. Ann Rehabil Med. 2021;45(3):225-59.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Kuru T, Olçar HA. Effects of early mobilization and weight bearing on postoperative walking ability and pain in geriatric patients operated due to hip fracture: a retrospective analysis. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(1):117-25.
  10. Kamel HK, Iqbal MA, Mogallapu R et al. Time to ambulation after hip fracture surgery: relation to hospitalization outcomes. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(11):1042-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Adunsky A, Arad M, Levi R et al. Five-year experience with the 'Sheba' model of comprehensive orthogeriatric care for elderly hip fracture patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(18-19):1123-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Lee SY, Yoon BH, Beom J et al. Effect of lower-limb progressive resistance exercise after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(12):1096.e19-26.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Siebens HC, Sharkey P, Aronow HU et al. Outcomes and weight-bearing status during rehabilitation after arthroplasty for hip fractures. PM R. 2012;4(8):548-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Lee SY, Jung SH, Lee SU et al. Effect of balance training after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(10):1679-85.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Okoro T, Ramavath A, Howarth J et al. What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail? results of a mixed methods study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:91.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Hesse S, Werner C, Seibel H et al. Treadmill training with partial body-weight support after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12):1767-73.
  17. Trudelle-Jackson E, Smith SS. Effects of a late-phase exercise program after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1056-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Komiyama K, Hamai S, Hara D et al. Dynamic hip kinematics during squatting before and after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):162.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Harada S, Hamai S, Gondo H et al. Squatting after total hip arthroplasty: patient-reported outcomes and in vivo three-dimensional kinematic study. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(4):734-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. In J. Introduction of a pilot study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70(6):601-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995;14(17):1933-40.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(3):394-400.
  24. Ross-McGill H, Hewison J, Hirst J et al. Antenatal home blood pressure monitoring: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107(2):217-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Stevinson C, Ernst E. A pilot study of Hypericum perforatum for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107(7):870-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Schenkman M, Berger RA, Riley PO et al. Whole-body movements during rising to standing from sitting. Phys Ther. 1990;70:638-48.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Turcot K, Armand S, Fritschy D et al. Sit-to-stand alterations in advanced knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2012;36:68-72.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Monaghan B, Cunningham P, Harrington P et al. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a physiotherapy-led functional exercise programme after total hip replacement. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(3):283-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Winther SB, Foss OA, Husby OS et al. A randomized controlled trial on maximal strength training in 60 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Acta orthopaedica. 2018;89(3):295-301.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Bernasek TL, Thatimatla NK, Levering M et al. Effect of immediate full weight bearing on abductor repair and clinical function after THA through a modified Hardinge approach. Orthopedics. 2013;36(3):e266-70.
  31. Tsukagoshi R, Tateuchi H, Fukumoto Y et al. Functional performance of female patients more than 6 months after total hip arthroplasty shows greater improvement with weight-bearing exercise than with non-weight-bearing exercise. Randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;50(6):665-75.
  32. Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Selles RW et al. The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):200-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Johansen A, Grose C, Havelock W. Hip fractures in the winter-using the national hip fracture database to examine seasonal variation in incidence and mortality. Injury. 2020;51(4):1011-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Tsang HF, Chan LWC, Cho WCS, et al. An update on COVID-19 pandemic: the epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment strategies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021;19(7):877-88.
    Pubmed CrossRef

June 2022, 34 (3)
Full Text(PDF) Free

Social Network Service

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)